Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| releng:4.16:roadmap:general_ui:csd [2019/09/18 00:51] – [Scenario 2: Full CSD, not full HeaderBar] ochosi | releng:4.16:roadmap:general_ui:csd [2020/08/20 20:50] (current) – add footer nav kevinbowen | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Code: https:// | Code: https:// | ||
| - | To use the new HeaderBar in lieu of the traditional XfceTitledDialog heading just add a < | + | To use the new HeaderBar in lieu of the traditional XfceTitledDialog heading just add a < |
| + | |||
| + | //For 4.16 we will be going with Scenario 2.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| ===== Scenarios ===== | ===== Scenarios ===== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 16: | ||
| This scenario should not be taken as a "go full Gnome style" | This scenario should not be taken as a "go full Gnome style" | ||
| [[https:// | [[https:// | ||
| - | ==== Scenario 2: Full CSD, not full HeaderBar ==== | + | |
| + | ==== Scenario 2: Full CSD, not full HeaderBar | ||
| This means | This means | ||
| * replacing XfceTitledDialog with a HeaderBar containing " | * replacing XfceTitledDialog with a HeaderBar containing " | ||
| - | * re-designing those apps that seem like low-hanging fruit (Taskmanager? Parole?) | + | * re-designing those apps that seem like low-hanging fruit (Taskmanager? |
| * using CSD only as simple window decorations for applications | * using CSD only as simple window decorations for applications | ||
| - | * SSD can still be dropped from xfwm4 (ochosi: not sure if it could really be dropped - olivier?) | ||
| * this ensures we can gradually make changes and get feedback along the way | * this ensures we can gradually make changes and get feedback along the way | ||
| Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
| * only using CSD for XfceTitledDialog (see scenario 2) and leaving the rest unchanged, so Xfwm4 decorations for applications like Thunar. | * only using CSD for XfceTitledDialog (see scenario 2) and leaving the rest unchanged, so Xfwm4 decorations for applications like Thunar. | ||
| * low effort | * low effort | ||
| - | * SSD cannot the dropped from xfwm4 | + | * visual inconsistency and uncertainty for app devs if they can/ |
| ==== Scenario 4: Stay where we are ==== | ==== Scenario 4: Stay where we are ==== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 36: | ||
| This means changing nothing with respect to window decorations or XfceTitledDialog. | This means changing nothing with respect to window decorations or XfceTitledDialog. | ||
| - | ===== Advantages and Disadvantages ===== | + | ---- |
| + | |||
| + | ===== General | ||
| Advantages of current XfceTitledHeader: | Advantages of current XfceTitledHeader: | ||
| Line 57: | Line 64: | ||
| * Risk of inconsistency if we don't write down good guidelines how headerbars/ | * Risk of inconsistency if we don't write down good guidelines how headerbars/ | ||
| * Users cannot match titlebar style and Gtk+ style independently (so if they don't like the look, they have to search for another theme) | * Users cannot match titlebar style and Gtk+ style independently (so if they don't like the look, they have to search for another theme) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| ====== Screenshots ====== | ====== Screenshots ====== | ||
| Line 64: | Line 73: | ||
| ===== Preferences Dialogs (libxfce4ui aka XfceTitledDialog) ===== | ===== Preferences Dialogs (libxfce4ui aka XfceTitledDialog) ===== | ||
| + | ==== Panel Settings (Dark Mode enabled) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| ==== Appearance Settings ==== | ==== Appearance Settings ==== | ||
| Line 80: | Line 93: | ||
| ===== Applications ===== | ===== Applications ===== | ||
| + | Three applications, | ||
| ==== Taskmanager ==== | ==== Taskmanager ==== | ||
| Line 102: | Line 116: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[|Back to Top]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | [[: | ||